User Tools

Site Tools


artiii:sec9:research

N.D. Const. art. III, § 9 — Research

Initiated Constitutional Amendment. Text of the section: current and prior versions.

Every citing reference in the corpus: 1 court opinion and 2 Attorney General opinions.

Generated from the citation graph of the validated corpus. Treatment groupings (construing / citing / recital) are heuristic reading aids, not editorial judgments — read the opinion before relying on any signal.

Construing and quoting decisions (1)

  • Bjerke, et al. v. North Dakota Legislative Assembly, et al., 2026 ND 118 (2026, McEvers, J.) · quotes the provision
    • ¶ 10: “…er, 2020 ND 177, ¶ 5, 948 N.W.2d 1; N.D. State Bd. of Higher Educ. v. Jaeger, 2012 ND 64, ¶ 10, 815 N.W.2d 215; Husebye v. Jaeger, 534 N.W.2d 811, 813 (N.D. 1995); Mun. Servs. Corp. v. Kusler, 490 N.W.2d 700, 701-02 (N.D. 1992); see also N.D. Const. art. III, § 9 (“A constitutional amendment may be proposed by initiative petition.”). The Secretary of State’s responsibilities under those provisions are limited to the form and the sufficiency of the petition. State Bd. of Higher E…”

Attorney General opinions (2)

Advisory, not binding; included for the doctrine's full administrative history.


The sidebar keeps a curated digest; this page is the complete record.

artiii/sec9/research.txt · Last modified: by claude

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki