User Tools

Site Tools


arti:sec1:sidebar

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
arti:sec1:sidebar [2019/01/28 23:30] – external edit 127.0.0.1arti:sec1:sidebar [2024/02/25 03:44] admin
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 == Cases - liberty and pursuit of happiness == == Cases - liberty and pursuit of happiness ==
-  - State ex rel. Goodsill v. Woodmanse, 1 N.D. 246, 46 N.W. 970, (N.D. 1890+  - State ex rel. Goodsill v. Woodmansee[[https://cite.case.law/nd/1/246/|1 N.D. 246]](N.D. 1890) 
-  - Cofman v. Ousterhous, 40 N.D390, 168 N.W. 826, 1918 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1918).+  - State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co., [[https://cite.case.law/nw/124/387/|124 N.W. 387]] (1910) 
 +  - Moody v. Hagen[[https://cite.case.law/nw/162/704/|162 N.W. 704]] (N.D. 1917
 +  - Cofman v. Ousterhous, [[https://cite.case.law/nw/168/826/|168 N.W. 826]], 1918 N.D. LEXIS 91 (N.D. 1918) 
 +  - State ex relGermain v. Ross, [[https://cite.case.law/nw/170/121/|170 N.W. 121]] (N.D. 1918) 
 +  - State ex rel. Bismarck v. District Court, [[https://cite.case.law/nw/253/744/|253 N.W. 744]] (1934)
   - State v. Cromwell, [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3933491/state-v-cromwell/|9 N.W.2d 914]] (N.D. 1943)   - State v. Cromwell, [[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3933491/state-v-cromwell/|9 N.W.2d 914]] (N.D. 1943)
-  - Rosen v. Bismarck, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/8644.htm|181 N.W.2d 722]] (N.D. 1970) +  - Tayloe v. City of Wahpeton, 62 N.W.2d 31 (N.D. 1953) 
-  - Johnson v. Elkin, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/9341.htm|263 N.W.2d 123]], (N.D. 1978) +  - State v. Odegaard, 165 N.W.2d 677 (N.D. 1969) 
-  - State v. Goetz, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/771.htm|312 N.W.2d 1]], (N.D. 1981)+  - Rosen v. Bismarck, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/181NW2d722|181 N.W.2d 722]] (N.D. 1970) 
 +  - Johnson v. Elkin, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/263NW2d123|263 N.W.2d 123]], (N.D. 1978) 
 +  - State v. Goetz, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/312NW2d001|312 N.W.2d 1]], (N.D. 1981)
  
 == Cases - bearing arms == == Cases - bearing arms ==
  
-  - State v. Ricehill, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/_court/opinions/870064.htm|454 N.W.2d 481]] (N.D. 1987) +  - State v. Ricehill, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/415NW2d481|415 N.W.2d 481]] (N.D. 1987) 
-  - Keller v. Keller, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/_court/opinions/20160334.htm|2017 ND 119]]+  - Keller v. Keller, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/2017ND119|2017 ND 119]] 
 + 
 +== Cases - enjoying and defending life and liberty == 
 +  * Wrigley v. Romanick, [[https://www.ndcourts.gov/supreme-court/opinion/2023ND50|2023 ND 50]] 
 +  
 +== Convention References == 
 +  * Journal p. {{ :conv:1889_journal_of_the_constitutional_convention.pdf#page=74| 74}}
  
 == Prior Versions == == Prior Versions ==
  
-  * [[https://www.ndconst.org/doku.php?id=arti:sec1&rev=1546919673|1889]] +  * [[https://www.ndconst.org/arti/sec1/start?rev=1594312993|1889]] 
-  * [[https://www.ndconst.org/doku.php?id=arti:sec1&do=revisions|Compare with prior version]]+  * [[https://www.ndconst.org/arti/sec1/start?do=diff&rev2%5B0%5D=1594312993&rev2%5B1%5D=1594313022&difftype=sidebyside|Changes from prior version]] 
 + 
 +== Scholarly works == 
 +  * Steven G. Calabresi & Sofía M. Vickery, [[http://texaslawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Calabresi-93-6.pdf|On Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment: The Original Understanding of the Lockean Natural Rights Guarantees]], 93 Tex. L.Rev. 1299 (2015) 
 +  * Joseph R. Grodin, [[https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol25/iss1/1/|Rediscovering the State Constitutional Right to Happiness and Safety]], 25 Hastings Const. L.Q. 1 (1997) 
 + 
 +== Parallel Provisions predating N.D. Const.== 
 + 
 +  - [[https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii|U.S. Const. amend. II]] ("A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
 +  - N.J. Const. art. I, sec. 1. See State v. Post, 20 N.J.L. 368, 372 (1845) 
 +  - Cal. Const. art. I, sec. 1. See Ex parte Newman, 9 Cal. 502, 503 (1858) 
 +  - N.H. Const. art. II. See Orr v. Quimby, 54 N.H. 590, 627 (1874) 
 +  - For several others, see [[https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.beal/zaag0001&i=1|Franklin Benjamin Hough, American Constitutions (1871)]]; [[https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.cow/feschag0001&i=1|Benjamin Perley Poore, Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the United States (1877)]].
  
arti/sec1/sidebar.txt · Last modified: 2024/02/25 03:47 by admin

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC0 1.0 Universal
CC0 1.0 Universal Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki